Taipower’s Nuclear waste disposal criticised
A coalition of environmental protection groups yesterday rallied in front of the legislature to protest Taiwan Power Co’s (Taipower) holding of an international bid to reprocess 1,200 bundles of highly radioactive nuclear fuel rods overseas, saying the move has violated administrative procedures and could encourage the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
On the day before Lunar New Year’s Eve, Taipower issued a call for bids to deliver 480 and 720 bundles of spent fuel rods from the Jinshan Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Shihmen District (石門) and the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s Wanli District (萬里) overseas for reprocessing. The state-run utility has budgeted NT$11.25 billion (US$356.4 million) despite having only an earmarked budget of NT$1.69 billion for the current fiscal year, which is still pending review by legislators.
Environmental activists have said that it is almost certain that French-based nuclear waste reprocessing company Areva will undertake the task.
Green Citizen Action Alliance deputy secretary-general Hung Shen-han (洪申翰) said that reprocessing nuclear waste is actually a means to extend the service life of the Jinshan and Guosheng plants, because the spent fuel pools at the facilities are nearing capacity and the New Taipei City Government will not approve Taipower’s request to set up dry storage casks outside the Jinshan plant amid concern over earthquakes and floods.
He said that nuclear waste reprocessing is aimed at recycling and reusing fissile materials — which are resold to international companies and governments — and that highly radioactive remnants of the reprocessed fissile materials will be sent back to Taiwan when the contract expires.
By then, Taiwan will still face the challenge of identifying a geologically stable site to store the nuclear waste.
Alliance researcher Hsu Shih-ya (徐詩雅) decried Taipower’s arbitrarily offering a sum much higher than the budget it asked for.
Accepting tenders for the plan violates the Budget Act (預算法), and Taipower will have to pay hefty damages — using taxpayers’ money — if the contract it inks with the project contractor is eventually revoked, Hsu said..
She said nuclear waste reprocessing is a controversial and sensitive issue, and the international community has veered away from nuclear waste reprocessing because of its steep cost and impact on the environment and public health.
Above all, the uranium and plutonium extracted during the process will likely be resold to nuclear weapons manufacturers, which will exacerbate the problem of nuclear arms proliferation, she said.
Hsu said the project proposed by Taipower would continue into 2038, but the contract discussed in the call for bids only has a 10-year validity, after which the nation will have to pay additional fees if it wants to entrust the fissile materials to the project contractor or have it resold.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Tien Chiu-chin (田秋堇) said that Taipower tried to slip in information about the plan in its budget proposal this year by including it in the same package as existing plans on nuclear waste disposal.
She accused the firm of lying by saying that the call for bids is part of an ongoing plan, adding that Taipower’s acceptance of tenders is both illegal and disrespectful to the legislature.